Thursday, March 14, 2013

This Just in From Squatchdetective

Ladies and gentlemen Steve Kulls has delivered a one-two punch tonight and you will not be disappointed.
 Earlier today Squatchdetective posted an article that I linked to in my previous post. I told someone on Facebook that Kulls is likea Wolverine tracking it's prey, and I wasn't wrong.

"Often in the course of investigations, in this case of a repeat offender, we go through the case file to see if there’s anything old that can be used.
In this case I can thank my compatriot Matt Knapp, bringing to my attention today something I forgot; Rick Dyer’s other YouTube page. The one, not so many people know about.
I’d also like to thank FB/FB for “authenticating” Ricks video and posting pictures he had sent them with their descriptions. Without their “authentication,” debunking this hoax would not have been possible"




Here is the link to the full story: Authenticated Alright! Authenticated Hoax!

I have this exact video in my collection of unpublished Dyerfiles, and confirm the video is legitimate as Mr. Kulls has presented it. I learned a thing or two after Rick scrubbed his YouTube channel, grab it while you can.

I don't know how Rick Dyer can possibly explain all of this, but I'm sure he'll give it a go.
I think someone definitely has some 'splainin' to do.

Racer X

54 comments:

  1. Great article again Randy!!! Bring down Dyer's reputation, he's nothing but a liar and a trouble maker who is tainting the legitimacy of bigfoot research.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know about this honestly. I have haven't looked at this real closely but the tent claim by Kulls doesn't look to be true. The fire does look close.

    I am not supporting Dyer and likely think this is a hoax. However, in my opinion Kulls is letting his personal feelings get in the way of his reasoning. In his previous post he took an earlier quote from Musky Allen and made it appear that it was something it wasn't. In the end most people won't care because it's Dyer, but if he really is a "detective" he needs to be more objective.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good work Steve Kulls!! That is the same fire. The EXACT same fire. Look very closely Anon 9:30, it is the same, boots are in both photos. Kulls spoke briefly on his very professionally set up radio show and moved on to the next topic. He didn't sound as if he's letting his personal feelings get in the way of his reasoning. He's Squatchdectiving, searching for the truth. Rick Dyer has told so many lies and the story of this shooting is too outlandish to be anywhere near believable. Steve is just doing what he does, outing the hoaxers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My impressions for what it's worth: I was listening to Dyer's call in show when Kull's article was brought up. Both he and his wife seemed to know when and where the tents were used and both seemed pretty surprised Kull claimed that they were the same. Dyer stated that they were a Walmart brand. In looking at them myself, they do not look alike to me.

    As far as the fire goes, I have looked at both videos and it appears to be the same image. My suggestion (again for what it's worth) is that the file image could have possibly been mixed up since it would be easy to mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree all this does not add up. Did Dyer commit insurance fraud with that RV+vehicle fire? Hmmm.... Hoax or not this whole "Shooting Bigfoot" deal is very elaborate I'll give him credit for that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dyer stated that insurance paid for the RV but did not compensate him for all the video equipment he lost.

      There are several layers in this whole thing that will be interesting to find out when this ends.

      Delete
  6. Here is some more evidence. Kate Quigley lists her resume online and she states that she served as a video logger while working on "Of Monsters and Men", in 2011. Rick Dyer claims that they were filming it in September of 2012.
    http://www.filmandtvpro.com/uk/view.php?uid=367769

    The staff of video loggers may be split into a day shift and night shift, working around the clock to log the hundreds of hours of footage gathered by field production crews on reality television programs, documentaries, news stories, and other unscripted shoots. Logging includes watching the entire recorded content and making meticulous notes in a logging software program that contains information on date, time, subject, conversation topics, cast or persons in the shot, location, and other metadata that aids the editor or other post-production crew in quickly locating a particular shot in a haystack of video.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting, but we cant tell if production stopped then or just represents the time she spent on it.

      Delete
  7. What a crock! You mugs would believe Kulls and Team Tazer puppet RacerX wouldnt you. So funny its not true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not part of Team Tazer, and they don't tell me how to run this blog. I am my own master.

      Delete
    2. Thats funny annon.They are puppets hey? So you are either Rick himself or a total imbecile.
      Now if someone could tell me what the difference would be, I would appreciate it.

      Delete
  8. RacerX you are much brighter than Kulls. I would be careful giving his evidence any credence as this could be your downfall. This about his evidence - really???

    tsk tsk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please spare me the scolding. FBFB put up a video and stated things as facts. Steve shows us these are not facts, and this evidence can't be ignored.
      I would think the video would've been reviewed by all parties before it was posted on YT.
      I also have corrected Mr. Kulls on errors in the past.
      Rick says FBFB took the photos from his FB page, but Rick had plenty of time to correct FBFB if mistakes were in the video.
      Somebody either didn't fact check or the party misrepresented photos.
      I'm sure you can at least agree with that.

      Delete
  9. FB/FB implied the photos of Morgan Matthews plus his alleged voice in the background are proof that Minnow was filming Rick Dyer in San Antonio. Turns out those photos are from 2011. FB/FB clearly stated the ribs were cooked over THIS FIRE, but that photo was from before. Same photo. Identical. Boots, flames, logs, everything is identical. This new tent video is worthless. What was the point??

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey Musky! What do you have to say about that message to Tim Mitchell? You have some 'splaining to do!

    ReplyDelete
  11. So... Rick cooked the ribs over a pair of burning boots sometime before April, 8. Nice twist.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is the best evidence you have for why Dryer is hoaxing?
    OMFG they reused prior video’s and spliced them together?
    This is what you all have? This doesn’t prove or disprove anything other than they used some other footage just to put together a video.
    It’s unbelievable that you believe that Minnow films couldn't have changed the direction of a movie when certain things happened.
    But now you’re saying Minnow films is on this big Hoax along with FB/FB again?
    You just made a disclaimer that you believe FB/FB guys are good guys and all they do to help bigfoot community out?
    You do know Rick didn't make this video it was FB/FB, right you do know that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FBFB said in their video that the photos are of Matthew Morgan and the fire was the very fire used to cook the ribs. That is false.
      A story line can't be changed half way through the movie. I'm sorry, your line of reasoning is illogical.
      This must be Cath McMillan.

      Delete
    2. oh john preston.....I saw your comment about bigfoot getting landlocked by all the buildings that went up so fast. hahah you are a riot!

      Delete
  13. The B.S is only ankle deep, except Rick is in head first. I'm losing track of what stage of the hoax we're at.
    It seems he's bouncing back and forth from #2 to #4.

    The Announcement
    Defensiveness or Attack of Critics
    Postponement of Evidence
    Postponement of Evidence Again
    Claim, you are a Victim of a Hoax

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Racer X,
    So you are into deleting comments when they disagree with you or point out your mistakes?
    "Anonymous Friday, March 15, 2013 6:55:00 AM
    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator."

    You say Rick needs to explain the video FB/FB put up. But he didn't make that video FB/FB did so maybe you should be asking them why they did those things?

    Also saying I am Cath McMillan, is that going to be your answer to anyone and everyone who corrects your mistakes in your own logic?


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I removed your comment because you're throwing insults. If you say you aren't Cath, then I'll take your word for it.
      Yes FBFB made the video. They are now intertwined in this tale (my opinion).
      What mistakes have I made?
      One doesn't just slap a video together without fact checking first. This is especially important because Rick's credibilty is less than perfect.
      Speak your mind but refrain from insults. If you wish to make a comment in favour of Rick, give me something to work with.
      This post was put up before Rick issued a statement on his blog. In all fairness I will make a post tonight and address what Rick has to say. Fair?

      Delete
    2. So Cath (John), are you saying Rick had nothing at all to do with the video FB/FB posted yesterday? It was all FB/FB trying to deceive?

      Delete
    3. Cathiee Mcmillan knows nothing about bigfoot and only wants to start trouble where ever he goes.

      Delete
    4. Hey Annon go post shit on Rick's site see if he even puts it up. I called him a mental midget...I was so shocked he didn't post it.
      You sir or madam or is it Pat?no matter are an ASS

      Delete
  16. Yoohoo, Musky, I know you read here so please tell us about that email to Tim Mitchell. We are VERY interested.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not him but I know how he answered this question. This email or PM was sent before Musky went to Las Vegas to see the body. That was when Musky was trying to figure out what Dyer was up to. This is his thoughts at that time. It is dated on Kulls page, although Kulls does not point the email actually confirms Musky's story.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the reply.

      Delete
  17. "I don't know how Rick Dyer can possibly explain all of this, but I'm sure he'll give it a go.
    I think someone definitely has some 'splainin' to do."
    You said the above did you not?
    Yet you just admitted that FB/FB made the video so why should Rick be explaining it he didn't make it. You are jumping on Rick about this just because your want to trash him every step of t he way. So you are not being fair. You also would have know that from moment the video was put up that Rick didn't make it heck it says FB/FB on it and FB/FB filmed some of it on the one Rick Posted. So no you are not being Fair. Why aren't you questioning your own source of where you get the information from?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're talking in circles. My information? Look at the photos. FBFB also did a re-enactment with Rick in their first video. They were with him. Rick postd the video on his own blog, yet he offers no clarifications or corrections. Yes, Rick needed to ciiment in the video because HE is what the vudeo is about. I said "someone" and that leaves it open to both parties.
      This is my blog and I will write as I see fit. If you don't agree that's fine.
      I won't be replyying to any more comments with circular logic.
      Please, everyone. Keep the discussion on topic and relevant.

      Delete
    2. *video* not vudeo. Stupid Iphones

      Delete
  18. Again, I am not Cath or John.
    I am not saying Fb/Fb is trying to deceive they made a video they took parts from other videos to make one. Dramatic License I would guess.
    But many of you get so caught up in these stupid details and miss the bigger pitcher because you want it to be a hoax but you can not prove it yet.
    "Yoohoo, Musky, I know you read here so please tell us about that email to Tim Mitchell. We are VERY interested"
    Musky actually answered this, and Musky showed the correct date and time on the original e-mail. But see you all want to believe so much its a hoax you don't question your own sources.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's up to Rick to prove it's real. The onus is not on anyone to prove it's a hoax but I enjoy a good mystery.

      Delete
    2. Where can I read Musky's explanation? Help a brother out. Thanks.

      Delete
    3. If anyone can point me to Musky's explanation, I would appreciate it. Anyone? Anyone?

      Delete
    4. See a little ways up - hint: check the date of the message.

      Delete
    5. You don't think Musky's trip to Las Vegas could be part of the scam? Of course he wouldn't tell you that part.

      Delete
  19. Rick claimed that he nailed some cooked ribs to a tree in order to draw in the subject (with the bushy spray tanned mustache that matched his spray tanned face and hair). What I don't understand, is why this bad actor failed to focus his attention on the tree, which was where the ribs were supposed to be. Instead, he appears to be looking around camp which does not flow well with the story line. Perhaps this is one of Dyer's first takes, or he failed to realize until later, his royal screwup.

    During a recent interview, Dyer claimed that he was camped at this location for at least 6 days. However, in the uncut interview of the homeless person, that person claimed that he was only there for 2 days. Furthermore, that person claimed that there was no Bigfoot shot there. FBFB cleverly cut both of these incriminating lines out of their version because they are attempting to manipulate the audience into believing the version that matches the book that they have their names attached too. Between FBFB rank amateur hoaxed video reviews and their tampering with evidence regarding the homeless person interview, I am sickened by their complete lack of good judgement and ethics. Yet they claim to be two upstanding citizens.

    In conclusion, Dyer perpetrates a hoax in order to convert it into notoriety that he can convert into money in his pocket. FBFB perpetrates a hoax in order to convert it into book sales and then into money in their pocket.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yes Rick needs to prove the Bigfoot he has is real.
    That is all he has to prove.
    Everything else you are going on about doesn't matter, its all just smoke and mirrors.

    He will either Prove it to be Real or prove it is a Hoax.
    So why not just wait?
    Waiting isn't going to hurt you or anyone. What is hurting is if you are wrong you will look the fool.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you realize how you all look right now for blindly believing? Yes blindly because you choose to close your eyes to what is in front of your faces. You will not only look like fools later, you look like fools right now. I hope it will all be worth it for your sakes. I doubt your new friends will be around for you when this is all over.

      Delete
    2. I am not the original OP nor am I sold on Dyer's story. I am interested in the lack of reasoning on both sides of this. People's emotions are getting in the way on some of the things brought forward.

      As far as embarrassment goes though, I would say the majority of people have kept this to themselves anyway.

      Delete
    3. Reasoning is why I think Dyer's story is a load of bull. Lack of reasoning is why people still believe him. Wake up.

      Delete
    4. I did not say that there were not many reasons to disbelieve Dyer. What I said is that there are people making issues out of things that you cannot put stock in either way. The critical reasoning of the "bigfoot community" as a whole is lacking. Steve Kulls is doing a whale of a job picking on minor items behind his computer. To claim by what he puts forth "wraps up" anything is absurd. It's obvious to many that he is driven by personal reasons right now. I wish he would practice his boots on the ground approach (if not himself, find someone) to deliver an actual kill shot.

      Delete
    5. FOLKS. It's all about the money.You people that think Rick has a body, or has even seen a Bigfoot are misguided.He will make you all out to be utter fools in the end.
      So much like those that got rich perpetuating the myth of 2012 Rick Dyer will suck you all in and laugh his ass off all the way to the bank.There will be no sympathy,no sorry I was wrong, he will slither back under his rock until the time is right to hoax yet again.

      Delete
  21. In the equipment in front of the tent photo, the tent in the background has no rain cover, and the fire pit is off to the right. In the Dyer in front of the green screen tent photo, the tent without the rain cover, it then immediately behind him, with the fire pit off to the left. The photos were taken from two opposite ends of the camp. Please also notice that there is no visible grass on the ground.

    Furthermore, the FBFB photo of the blue tent at the homeless camp, shows that the ground is solidly covered with about 12 inch high grass. Where is the grass in the previous photos?

    ReplyDelete
  22. I agree, the tent photos don't seem to be the same but everything else Steve Kulls exposed is right. You can't deny that. I don't see how FB/FB could have used the photos unknowingly unless Rick Dyer provided them. If FB/FB used the photos to intentionally deceive, then that should tell you something loud and clear. Racer X is also right in that Dyer used the extended video on his blog without making any corrections. This is not an oversight people. These guys are lying to you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hypothetically, It wouldn't be hard to mistake a campfire image from another one, i.e. could be a honest mistake.

      Delete
    2. It's not and you know it. Stop making excuses for them.

      Delete
    3. Same flame pattern. Same burning boots. What are the chances of two separate campfires at two separate locations, having both of those two charactestics exactly in common. Mmmmm, oh I'd say just about as close to zero chance as one can get, without going negative.

      Delete
  23. "It's not and you know it. Stop making excuses for them".

    I'm just pointing out a possibility and I don't think it's necessarily far-fetched. You may disagree, that's fine. I don't think anyone disputes that the fire pictures are the same.

    ReplyDelete