Wednesday, March 13, 2013

ARTIST RENDERING OF THE SASQUATCH IN THE CAMPER/TENT VIDEO


I have seen the recent release by FB/FB of the artist's interpretation of what Musky Allen saw in Las Vegas. I am hesitant to call it a Bigfoot because the rest of us have not seen the alleged body.
  Musky is sticking to his word, and if he saw a Bigfoot, I really can't refute his claims as of this writing.
  The gentlemen of FB/FB had this to say along side the photo:

  "This picture was drawn by David Durrett after 25 exchanges w/ 'Musky Allen' of face and neck of Sasquatch from San Antonio. It was just sent to us by Musky. He says it is an extremely close representation of the cranio-facial features. This is a very important story and we would like to emphasize that this is a real situation. Neither Musky Allen nor any of the Admins of this site are part of a hoax. Our promise to take down FBFB and resign from Bigfoot research remains if this story turns out not to be genuine."


In a previous post I made, I had suggested or speculated it was possible the FB/FB owners were in on what I consider to be a hoax. I still think it's a hoax, and I will think so until Rick Dyer produces the body. The viewing of said body has been delayed yet again according to the rumor mill.
  I am taking FB/FB's word at face value. The statement they made is unambiguous, so there is no room for interpretation. They say they are not part of a scheme or hoax and I accept that.
  However, if I do find anything to the contrary, I will report about it.
Okay, let's see the monkey:





In my personal opinion this is a much more life like rendition than the one Rick commissioned. I'm not saying it's a real dead Bigfoot, I just appreciate this one more as a piece of artwork.
  You will notice the added text on the lower area of the artwork, and I find the wording very odd.
 "However, to remain compliant with non-disclosure arrangements, no characteristics indicating or suggesting the cause of death have been shown."

This confuses me somewhat. It's perfectly okay for Musky Allen to show us an artists interpretation of what he saw, but the artist had to omit the wounds? Um...why?
  Rick Dyer has said countless times exactly how the "Bigfoot" met it's demise. Shot through the back of the head, knocking out two teeth is what Dyer said.
So, it's fine to talk about what happened, but we are not allowed to see the trauma caused to the facial area. This makes little sense to me.
 Let's compare the three facial pictures we know to exist. I will re-post the above rendering so you don't have to scroll. First up will be a screen capture from the tent video.


To my eye, these look nothing alike but decide for yourself. You can visit the FB/FB fan page here. All copyrights belong to the copyright holders.


Racer X

21 comments:

  1. Personally I don't think most people would care to see any trauma wounds if they exist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would because it's relevant to the story.

      Delete
    2. Anon, wth? IF they exist? This BF was supposedly killed by a gunshot. Everyone knows it. There is no IF trauma wounds exist. Second, if people don't want to see trauma wounds, don't look at the picture. However if your trying to draw an accurate representation of the bigfoot Allen supposedly saw, you can't just draw stuff the way you want it to look. It's worthless if its not accurate.

      Delete
    3. I feel kind of strange arguing about something that most likely didn't happen but here goes. The gunshot was supposed to have entered the neck/head area and have exited the mouth. If that's the case, I can see a scenario where there would not be a huge amount of damage. Not absent, but not a large amount either. I get tired of impromptu experts saying that the exit wound would have taken a softball size amount of flesh. Ballistics do not happen the way people often predict.

      I think the point was to show how the animal looked in general. If there was a missing persons sketch based on an autopsy report, I doubt they would include bullet holes- the same principal here.

      Delete
  2. Another great article Randy! Thanks for your work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ignore the trolls racer. They are foaming at the mouth because they can`t post about their idol on bff.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey anon 8:34, go suck eggs!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This proves that this entire story is a hoax. Why? Because there is no longer the big bushy mustache that shows up clearly in the enhanced tent video as seen on youtube. It is absolutely unbelievable how blind FB/FB is. This leads me to believe that they are either in on the hoax despite their denials, or they are both complete morons.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey anon 12:00 U mad bro ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently. Certainly looks that way.

      Delete
  7. Has anyone seen the tent vid with the audio? This pic to me looks right, the differences between RD and MA's pics are about right when asking 2 people to describe something, there seems to be too much info for even the hardened of sceptics to say that this is a flat out hoax now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not true. There are still holes in this story so numerous it is hard to miss for most. There are only a handful of supporters defending Dyer and Musky. Most of the community just looks the other way. Tent vid audio adds NOTHING in the way of proof. Have you lost your mind?

      Delete
    2. It conceivably adds to the claim that Morgan Matthews was filming with Dyer, and therefore backs up his claim to a point. I say conceivably because I have no idea if that is Mathews' voice and no one has weighed in on that yet. Steve Kulls was making the claim that there was very little chance the Minnow films/Matthews was filming with Dyer.

      Delete
    3. Exactly anon 3:41.. Thats my point. There are holes in every story that is told, most people do not have photographic memories therefore if there were NO holes what so ever then that would make this story more so on the unbelievable side. The fact is that the differences do, to me, fall within reasonable limits. We are all human and not robots so people do say things in the wrong context or jumbled up or just simply by mistake. The thing is I have followed this from the start and my feelings from the beginning were that the tent vid was real. When I learned that RD was the person who filmed this I actually thought it leant more credability to the story im not going to ellaborate why now. Furthermore, I have watched every one of Ricks radio shows and have listened to all the people involved tell, re-tell, answer questions etc and my conclusion is that I believe Rick 100%, I believe Musky 100%, I believe FB/FB 100%. (Bashing start here.........) I already know whats coming the same shit 'your heads so far up Ricks but' 'boy your so gullable' and so on and so on.. I have been Bashed on every blog for supporting this and been equally bashed for posting anon. Im sorry but im at work when I post and have to go through portals so have no choice but to post anon, my name is Phil Goryl, I live in the UK (tea, crumpets, scones yeah yeah)

      Delete
  8. Enhanced tent video
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiKSKv2ZReQ

    The bushy mustache is plain as day and it has received the exact same spray tan as the rest of the head. Bushy mustache's have never been recorded to be the exact same color as the skin of the underlying individual, in the history of mankind, and certainly not on any Bigfoot. There is still not a shred of evidence to support this video as being genuine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How do you know that then? maybe mankind but you cant say that about bigfoots unless you actually have some to look at!

      Delete
    2. And we don't have any to look at!!!!

      Delete
    3. Yet, have faith brother ;)

      Delete
    4. Please notice that Dyer has gone completely silent, with the airing of this phony artist rendition. Many people don't realize that there are people in this world that are pathological liars. They will lie just to stay in practice. Dyer has revealed that he is in this for the notoriety. Last time, he converted notoriety into money by running expeditions. Dyer is sticking with his guns, for the notoriety that he will convert to cash in his pocket. Lieing means nothing to Dyer. Getting caught means nothing to him. Fooling people is just a game to him.

      Delete
    5. Gone completely silent? He has a radio show on the last couple of nights. You may be right about the pathological liar thing, although I have a hard time seeing him doing bigfoot related after this unless he produces. I think the sheer absoluteness of many of his claims are what have many people hooked. He may have been able to do this after the first hoax, but if this is a repeat I seriously doubt he will be able to do much afterwards.

      Delete
  9. put a Saint's cap on him...and call it a day, because that BF is the spitting image of our dear friend Musty...oh I mean Musky. lol

    ReplyDelete