I noticed Sweeps week has come to a close. Rick stated on numerous radio shows that CNN would be airing an interview with himduring the period known as sweeps week.
During one show Dyer says CNN already did the interview but were waiting. In another show he said they (CNN) were coming to his house. Why do that if an interview had already taken place? Sweep week is finished, where is this earth shattering news coverage of an alleged dead Bigfoot?
Let me guess what Rick would say:
1.) It was a joke.
2.) It was said to throw people off.
3.) It's all part of his plan to annoy the Bigfoot Community.
4.) CNN is waiting for another Sweeps Week.
5.) CNN had too many conditions, so I backed out.
This is what I say:
1.) Delay tactic.
2.) It's a BIG FAT LIE!
3.) Once a hoaxer and liar, always a hoaxer and liar.
I really wish people would wake up to the likelihood this is an elaborate hoax. Ricky stated in a recent blog post that he has made $10,000 off ad sense since September, 2012.
"Why you ask? It comes down to Rick Dyer laughing at the end. Sense late September I have made almost 10,000 dollars from adsense off people who hate me."
Rick, people "hate" you because you're a hoaxer and a liar. You did this to yourself.Rick Dyer calls other people in the field hoaxers with NO proof, just his word.
Rick teams up with Musky Allen to out Shawn Evidence's real identity, thus causing Shawn to out himself.
Rick's fall back is "people are haters and jealous of me". That's completely false.
I have yet to witness Rick Dyer answer ONE question with a legitimate answer.
Here are a few questions I would ask if I was a CNN correspondent:
1.) Rick, in 2012 you stated you saw a Bigfoot near a Home Depot in the year 2009. My investigation shows in 2010 and 2011 you said Bigfoot was not real. It was as real as the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny. You were a "super skeptic".
Can you explain the discrepancy?
2.) Recently you pulled almost all of your videos. Many of these videos contained inconsistencies with your present story.
Do you have an answer for this?
3.) In the beginning, you said you fired one shot to the back of the head of the alleged Bigfoot. This claim remained the same until recently. Now you claim two shots were fired. Why did your story change?
4.) The other day, you had an interview with the people at FB/FB. During the interview you say, in your own words, you don't look for any signs such as foot prints, hair and you don't use wood knocks or call blasting to try to attract Bigfoot and lure one in closer.
How did you know exactly where to set up camp?
5.) Many people have been trying to find the exact location where you claimed to have killed this alleged Bigfoot. A few people claimed to have found this area, and in a recent interview with a local news station, you appear to confirm this area. A homeless man said you were there as well.
Why do you deny this is the spot? Why did you not correct the reporter if he/she was wrong?
6.) It's a well known fact that you claimed to have shot this creature at approximately 2:30 in the morning on or about Sept. 6/12. It is also known, as stated by you that a film crew as well as other people on an expedition were with you. Facts show this area is populated with many homeless individuals.
Why would you attempt to shoot at a creature, in the dark, with so many others in the vicinity?
7.) The original "Tent Video" was uploaded in black and white and sideways. You also used a pseudonym.
Why do this?
There are many, many more questions one could ask. It's easy to get caught up in this story, a story that seems to change with every passing day. The truth never changes but lies do.
The only conclusion I can come to at this point in time is that Rick's story doesn't add up. I'm not emotionally attached to it and I have nothing to lose or gain, regardless of the outcome. His story has more holes than swiss cheese.